Scenario of scientific production on health technologies in the context of latent tuberculosis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/ce.v30i0.99354ptKeywords:
Tuberculosis, Latent Tuberculosis, Biomedical Technology, Scientific and Technical Publications, BibliometricsAbstract
Objective: To analyze scientific production on the use of health technologies in the context of latent tuberculosis.
Method: A descriptive, quantitative study with bibliometric analysis, carried out in the Scopus and Web of Science databases in December 2024, with descriptive statistical analysis and application of bibliometric laws based on the Bibliometrix package in Script R®.
Results: 176 studies were identified, with a peak in production in 2022; of these, 159 studies were published in scientific article format and 156 in English. Wang Y was the most productive author, with 13 published documents. The United States stood out in terms of production by country, and Johns Hopkins University had 15 affiliated authors. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease was the primary source of publications. The terms “tuberculosis” and “latent tuberculosis” were the most common terms used to index the documents.
Conclusion: The behavior of information on the subject has risen.
References
1. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Manual de recomendações para o controle da tuberculose no Brasil [Internet]. 2.ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2019 [cited 2025 Jan 16]. 363 p. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/saude-de-a-a-z/t/tuberculose/publicacoes/manual-de-recomendacoes-para-o-controle-da-tuberculose-no-brasil.pdf
2. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Manual de recomendações para o diagnóstico laboratorial de tuberculose e micobactérias não tuberculosas de interesse em saúde pública no Brasil [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2022 [cited 2025 Jan 16]. 489 p. Available from: https://www.gov.br/aids/pt-br/central-de-conteudo/publicacoes/2022/manual-diagnostico-laboratorial-de-tb-e-micobacterias-nao-tuberculosas-no-brasil_22.pdf/view
3. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Boletim epidemiológico - Tuberculose 2024 – Número especial: março de 2024 [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2024 [cited 2025 Jan 17]. 67 p. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/boletins/epidemiologicos/especiais/2024/boletim-epidemiologico-de-tuberculose-numero-especial-mar-2024.pdf/view
4. da Penha JRL, Fernandes FA, Oliveira CC, de Oliveira RD, Barros EF. Validation and use of new technologies in health and education: an integrative review. Rev Interdiscip Promoção Saúde [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Jan 18];1(3):199-206. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17058/rips.v1i3.12580
5. Millán-Toledo C. Bibliometric analysis of dividend policy research. Dimens empress [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jan 23];17(2):1756. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15665/dem.v17i2.1756
6. Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS). Meta de eliminação da tuberculose nas Américas até 2035 é possível, afirma representante da OPAS/OMS no Brasil. OPAS [Internet]. 2022 Mar 24 [cited 2025 Jan 23];Notícias:[about 2 screens]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/pt/noticias/24-3-2022-meta-eliminacao-da-tuberculose-nas-americas-ate-2035-e-possivel-afirma
7. Mussi RFF, Mussi LMPT, Assunção ETC, Nunes CP. Pesquisa Quantitativa e/ou Qualitativa: distanciamentos, aproximações e possibilidades. Sustinere [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Sep 16];7(2):414-430. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12957/sustinere.2019.41193
8. Marconi MA, Lakatos EM. Metodologia Científica. 8 ed. São Paulo: GEN Atlas; 2022. 392 p.
9. Chueke GV, Amatucci M. Métodos de sistematização de literatura em estudos científicos: bibliometria, meta-análise e revisão sistemática. Internext [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Aug 12];17(2):284-92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v17i2.704
10. Quevedo-Silva F, Santos EBA, Brandão MM, Vils L. Bibliometric study: guidelines on its application. REMark, Rev Bras Marketing [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Sep 19];15(2):246-262. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v15i2.3274
11. Araújo WCO. Recuperação da informação em saúde: construção, modelos e estratégias. ConCI: Conv Ciênc Inform [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Sep 19];3(2):100-134. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33467/conci.v3i2.13447
12. Steele A, Garrett N, Davidson A, Jatko M, Eisert S, Lyons P. Encoded guidelines for targeted latent tuberculosis screening using an electronic medical record. AMIA Annu Symp Proc [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2025 Feb 20];2003:1017. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14728520/
13. Chaw L, Chien LC, Wong J, Takahashi K, Koh D, Lin RT. Global trends and gaps in research related to latent tuberculosis infection. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Feb 20];20:352. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8419-0
14. da Silva JA, Rufino ENM, Sampaio BF, Silva DM. Impacto da pandemia de COVID-19 no número de casos e na mortalidade da tuberculose. REASE [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Aug 10];9(11):1964-1973. Available from: https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v9i11.12500
15. Pagaduan JV, Altawallbeh G. Chapter Two - Advances in TB testing. Adv Clin Chem [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Feb 21];115:33-62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acc.2023.03.003
16. Teixeira E, Mota VMSS. Educação em saúde: tecnologias educacionais em foco. São Caetano do Sul: Difusão Editora; 2011. 105 p.
17. Martins AMEDL, Silva e Diogo AT, Salbego C, de Oliveira FBS, Martins LBL, Martins MBL, et al. Classificações e conceitos de tecnologias em saúde.
REAS [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Feb 21];24(10):e17748. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.25248/REAS.e17748.2024
18. Betineli P. Manejo de indivíduos com tuberculose na atenção básica: cartilha para profissionais de saúde [Internet]. Rio Grande do Sul: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2024 [cited 2025 Feb 21]. 30 p. Available from: https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/283310
19. Kawakibi MA, Indrawan F. The importance of English in international science research collaboration. TEFLICS [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Feb 22];4(1):40-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33752/teflics.v4i1.6544
20. Cariranha L. A importância da divulgação de artigos científicos. Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia [Internet]. 2024 Jul 19 [cited 2025 Feb 22];Notícias:[about 3 screens]. Available from: https://www.uesb.br/noticias/a-importancia-da-divulgacao-de-artigos-cientificos/
21. Machado Junior C, de Souza MTS, Parisotto IRS, Palmisano A. As leis da bibliometria em diferentes bases de dados científicos. Rev Ciênc Adm [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Feb 23];18(44):111-123. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p111
22. de Andrade EGR, Rodrigues ILA, Valois RC, Peixoto IVP, Nogueira LMV, de Matos WDV, et al. Profile of scientific production on latent tuberculosis infection: bibliometric study. Rev Enferm Atual In Derme [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Feb 23];96(39):e-021297. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31011/reaid-2022-v.96-n.39-art.1455
23. Almeida CC, Gracio MCC. O Fator de Impacto e as boas práticas de avaliação científica. Ci Inf Rev [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Aug 12];7(1):138-152. Available from: https://www.seer.ufal.br/index.php/cir/article/view/8865
24. Elsevier [Internet]. [Amsterdam]: Elsevier; c2024 [cited 2025 Feb 24]. CiteScore: metrics you can verify and trust;[about 6 screens] Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus/metrics/citescore
25. de Souza ERC, Ferreira IP, Carvalho GP. Bibliometric study on pedagogical practice in nurse training in the context of MERCOSUR. Rev Enferm UFSM [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Feb 24];13:e33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5902/2179769283866
26. Gomes TPD. Leis bibliométricas de Zipf e ponto de transição de Goffman: reflexões com estudos pioneiros. In: 9º Encontro Brasileiro de Bibliometria e Cientometria [Internet]; 2024 Jul 23-26; Brasília, DF. Brasília, DF: Universidade de Brasília; 2024 [cited 2025 Feb 24]. Avaliable from: https://ebbc.inf.br/ojs/index.php/ebbc/article/view/304/373
27. Tavares WQ, Celerino VG. A importância da bibliometria para a indexação automática. Folha de Rosto [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Feb 25];4(2):7-14. Available from: https://periodicos.ufca.edu.br/ojs/index.php/folhaderosto/article/view/273
28. Castillo-González W, López Sánchez AA, González-Argote J. Bibliometría en ciencias de la salud: una propuesta metodológica. Data and Metadata [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Feb 25];3:410. Available from: https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024.410
29. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Política Nacional de Gestão de Tecnologias em Saúde (PNGTS) [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2010 [cited 2025 Mar 03]. 47 p. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/politica_nacional_gestao_tecnologias_saude.pdf
30. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Brasil livre da tuberculose: Plano Nacional pelo Fim da Tuberculose como Problema de Saúde Pública – Estratégias para 2021-205 [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2021 [cited 2025 Mar 4]. 67 p. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/svsa/tuberculose/brasil-livre-da-tuberculose/view
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Reinaldo de Souza Guimarães, Marcia Helena Machado Nascimento, Bruna Renata Farias dos Santos, Sara Valena do Rosário Sales Miranda, Lucrecia Aline Cabral Formigosa, George Pinheiro Carvalho, Rubenilson Caldas Valois
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cogitare Enfermagem reserves the right to make normative, orthographic, and grammatical changes to the published article to maintain the cultured standard of the language, while respecting the authors' style.
The published study is the sole responsibility of the author(s), and Cogitare Enfermagem is exclusively responsible for evaluating the manuscript as a scientific publication vehicle. Revista Cogitare Enfermagem is not responsible for any violations of Law No. 9,610/1998, the Brazilian Copyright Law.
Cogitare Enfermagem allows the author to hold the copyright of articles accepted for publication, without restrictions.
The articles published are licensed under the Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0 - The attribution adopted by Cogitare Enfermagem is permitted:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any media or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution - You must give proper credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes have been made. You may do this in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests that the licensor endorses it or approves of its use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing something that the license allows.
