CRACK USERS’ EVALUATION REGARDING FAMILY GROUPS IN THE PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE CENTER

Authors

  • Lourdes Custódio Duarte Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • kelly Viana
  • Agnes Olschowsky

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v20i1.37597

Keywords:

Self-help groups, Evaluation of health services, Crack cocaine, Family.

Abstract

This study sought to qualitatively evaluate
the perception of crack users regarding family groups. It
is an excerpt from a qualitative study undertaken in 2012
in a Psychosocial Care Center – Alcohol and Drugs, in the
South of Brazil. It used the theoretical framework of Fourth
Generation Evaluation, with the Hermeneutic-Dialectic
Circle as its methodological device, through observations
and interviews held with 12 crack users. The Constant
Comparative Method was used in the analysis, which
generated the unit of meaning of Family Group. The group
was evaluated by the crack users as an important space
for the family members, serving as a source of listening,
relieving feelings by expressing grievances, information,
and instrumentalizing them in how to deal with the crack
users in the home. It is suggested that the substitute services
should make varying hours available for family groups, so
as to loyalize the families in these spaces and promote the
continuity of the treatment and the beneficial effects for
the crack users.

Author Biographies

Lourdes Custódio Duarte, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Enfermeira, Doutora em Enfermagem, Professora Adjunta do Departamento de Assistência e Orientação Profissional da Escola de Enfermagem da UFRGS,

kelly Viana

Enfermeira, Técnica Administrativa em Educação, UFRGS, Porto Alegre

Agnes Olschowsky

Enfermeira,Doutora em Enfermagem, Professora Titular do Departamento de Assistência e Orientação Profissional da Escola de Enfermagem da UFRGS

Published

2015-03-31

How to Cite

Duarte, L. C., Viana, kelly, & Olschowsky, A. (2015). CRACK USERS’ EVALUATION REGARDING FAMILY GROUPS IN THE PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE CENTER. Cogitare Enfermagem, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v20i1.37597

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE