Form of the state-norm and fact of the pastoral power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v62i2.52428Keywords:
Complexity. State-norm. Postmodernism. Pastoral power. Psychoanalysis.Abstract
The complex structure of subjectivity in the Postmodernism (Harvey, Jameson, Raymond) is the object of an aggressive reduction through the tool of the state-norm, which traversed the many historical phases of the bourgeois modernity of Capitalism. Its discursive structure was analyzed by Habermas; the pastoral power was focused on Foucault’s theory of discipline; the peculiar structure of the repetition – repetitiveness – was inherited by Deleuze from the Freudian category of coerciveness; Lacan enounced the dialectics of normative-symbolic repression; and Judith Butler supposed a double bind subjection-subjectivation. This feature of the state-norm is also investigated by popular culture and imaginary, of which we mention here the examples of David Lynch and Cormac McCarthy. The author seeks a clear distinction between the criticism of Law and the critical analysis of normative juridical forms, throughout a comparison with other normative forms: moral and family standards (a domain that is strictly symbolic), as well as institutions of normative structure (the domain of modern alienation). Methodologically, modern linguistic, systemic, psychology and complexity theories are also taken into account.
References
ADORNO, Theodor W. [2002] – Filosofia della musica moderna, Torino, Einaudi.
AGAMBEN, Giorgio [2007] – Il Regno e la Gloria. Per una genealogia teologica dell’economica e del governo, Milano, Neri Pozza.
ALTHUSSER, Louis [1965, 2005] – Pour Marx, Paris, La Découverte.
ALTHUSSER, Louis [1976] – Idéologies et appareils idéologiques d’État, in Positions, Paris, Ed. Sociales.
APEL, Karl Otto – DUSSEL, Enrique [1999] – Etica della comunicazione ed etica della liberazione, a cura di A. Savignano, Napoli, Editoriale scientifica.
APEL, Karl Otto [1973] – Transformation der Philosophie, vol. 2, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
APEL, Karl Otto [1990] – Penser avec Habermas contre Habermas, Paris, Éditon de l’Éclat.
APEL, Karl Otto [1994] – Fundamentos de semiótica: sentido lingüístico e intencionalidad. La compatibilidad del “giro lingüístico” y el “giro pragmático” de la teoría de la semiótica trascendental, in Dussel, Debate en torno a la ética del discurso di Apel. Diálogo filosófico Norte-Sur desde América Latina, Mexico-Madrid, Siglo veintiuno editores, 254-312.
APEL, Karl Otto [2001] – La relation entre morale, droit et démocratie. La philosophie du droit de Jürgen Habermas jugée du point de vue d’une pratique transcendantale, in Les études philosophiques, 2001/1, n. 56, 67-80.
BAUDRILLARD, Jean [1976, 2007] – Lo scambio simbolico e la morte, Milano, Feltrinelli.
BENJAMIN, Walter [2006] – Sulla facoltà mimetica, in Angelus Novus. Saggi e frammenti, a cura di R. Solmi, con un saggio di F. Desideri, Torino, Einaudi, 71.
BENJAMIN, Walter [2006] – Sulla lingua in generale e sulla lingua dell’uomo, in Angelus Novus. Saggi e frammenti, a cura di R. Solmi, con un saggio di F. Desideri, Torino, Einaudi, 53.
BORCH-JACOBSEN, Mikkel [1995] – Lacan. Le maître absolu, Paris, Flammarion.
BOURDIEU, Pierre [1998] – La domination masculine, Paris, Seuil.
BOURDIEU, Pierre [2001] – Langage et pouvoir symbolique, Paris, Fayard.
BROWN, Wendy [2001] – Politics out of history, Princeton univ. pr.
BROWN, Wendy [2003] – Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy, in Theory & Event, 2003, vol. 7, n. 1.
BROWN, Wendy [2006] – American nightmare: neo-liberalism, neoconservatism and de-democratization, in Political theory, 2006, 34.
BROWN, Wendy [2007] – Les habits neufs de la politique mondiale. Néolibéralisme et néo-conservatisme, Paris, Les prairies ordinaires.
CASTORIADIS, Cornelius [1975] – L’institution imaginaire de la société, Paris, Seuil.
CASTORIADIS, Cornelius [1995] – Logic, imagination, reflection, in Elliott – Frosh (dir.), Psychoanalysis in contexts: paths between theory and modern culture, London, Routledge.
CASTORIADIS, Cornelius [1997] – Done and to be done, in Curtis – Ames, The Castoriadis reader, Oxford, Blackwell.
DELEUZE, Gilles – GUATTARI, Felix [1972] – L’Anti-Œdipe, Paris, Minuit (trad. italiana di Alessandro Fontana, L’anti-Edipo. Capitalismo e schizofrenia, Torino, Einaudi, 2002).
DELEUZE, Gilles [1967] – Présentation de Sacher-Masoch. Le Froid et le Cruel, Paris, Minuit.
DELEUZE, Gilles [1969] – Logique du sens, Paris, Minuit (trad. italiana di Mario De Stefanis, Logica del senso, Milano, Feltrinelli 2007).
DELEUZE, Gilles [1970] – Spinoza, Paris, PUF.
DERRIDA, Jacques [1994] – Force de loi, Paris, Galilée.
DESCOMBES, Vincent [1996] – Les Institutions du sens, Paris, Minuit.
DIAMOND, Elin [2004] – Feminst readings of Beckett, in Oppenheim, L. [ed. 2004] – Samuel Beckett studies, London, Macmillan (Palgrave).
DUSSEL, Enrique [1977] – Filosofía de la Liberación, México, Edicol.
DUSSEL, Enrique [1993] – Las metáforas teologícas de Marx, Estella, edv.
DUSSEL, Enrique [1994] – Debate en torno a la ética del discurso de Appel. Diálogo filosófico Norte-Sur desde América Latina, Mexico-Madrid, Siglo veintiuno editores.
DUSSEL, Enrique [1999] – Sei principi dell’architettonica dell’Etica della liberazione, in Apel – Dussel, Etica della comunicazione ed etica della liberazione, a cura di A. Savignano, Napoli, Editoriale scientifica.
FOUCAULT, Michel [1976] – Sorvegliare e punire. Nascita della prigione, Torino, Einaudi.
FOUCAULT, Michel [2000] – Io, Pierre Rivière, avendo sgozzato mia madre, mia sorella e mio fratello… Un caso di parricidio nel XIX secolo a cura di Michel Foucault, introduzione di Paolo Crepet, Torino, Einaudi.
FOUCAULT, Michel [2001] – «Omnes et singulatim»: vers une critique de la raison politique, in Dits et écrits II, 1976-1988, Paris, Gallimard, 953.
FOUCAULT, Michel [2004] – Sécurité, territoire, population. Cours au Collège de France. 1977-1978, Paris, Seuil/Gallimard.
FREUD, Sigmund [2006] – L’uomo Mosé e la religione monoteistica e altri scritti, in Opere 1930 – 1938, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri.
HABERMAS, Jürgen [1971] – Knowledge and human interests, trad. Jeremy J. Shapiro, Boston, Beacon Press.
HABERMAS, Jürgen [1987] – “Excursus on Cornelius Castoriadis: the imaginary institution”, in The philosophical discourse of modernity, trad. Frederick Lawrence, Cambrudge, Polity, 327-335.
HABERMAS, Jürgen [1996] – Fatti e Norme. Contributi a una teoria discorsiva del diritto e della democrazia, a cura di L. Ceppa, Milano, Guerini e Associati.
HABERMAS, Jürgen [1999] – De l’éthique de la discussion, Paris, Flammarion/Champs.
HABERMAS, Jürgen [2001] – Morale, diritto, politica, Torino, Edizioni di Comunità.
HABERMAS, Jürgen [2006] – Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica, Roma-Bari, Laterza.
HÖFFE, Otfried [2001] – Globalizzazione e diritto penale, Torino, Edizioni di Comunità.
HORKHEIMER, Max – ADORNO, Theodor W. [1947, 1997] – Dialettica dell’illuminismo, Torino, Einaudi.
HORKHEIMER, Max [1976] – Studi sull’autorità e la famiglia, Torino, UTET.
JAMESON, Friedric [2007] – Postmodernismo ovvero La logica culturale del tardo capitalismo, Roma, Fazi.
KLOSSOWSKI, Pierre [1933] – Eléments d’une étude psychanaytique sur le marquis de Sade, in Revue de Psychanalyse.
LACAN, Jacques [1932, 1975] – De la psychose paranoïaque dans ses rapports avec la personnalité suivi de Premiers écrits sur la paranoïa, Paris, Seuil.
LACAN, Jacques [1964, 1973] – Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse. Séminaire, Livre XI, texte établi par J.-A. Miller, Paris, Seuil.
LACAN, Jacques [1966, 1999] – Écrits, Paris, Seuil.
LACAN, Jacques [2005] – Introduction aux noms-du-Père, in Des noms-du-Père, Paris, Seuil, 67.
LAЇDI, Zaki [2000] – Le sacre du présent, Paris, Champs/Flammarion.
LEGENDRE, Pierre [2000] – Le crime du caporal Lortie. Traité sur le Père, Paris, Flammarion, Champs.
LUHMANN, Niklas [1995] – Procedimenti giuridici e legittimazione sociale, Milano, Giuffrè.
LUHMANN, Niklas [2002] – I diritti fondamentali come istituzione, Bari, Dedalo.
LYOTARD, Jean-François [1979] – La condition postmoderne. Rapport sur le savoir, Paris, Minuit.
MARX, Karl [1991] – Per la critica della filosofia del diritto di Hegel, in La questione ebraica, trad. di R. Panzieri, Roma, Editori Riuniti.
MARX, Karl [2003] – Le lotte di classe in Francia 1848-1856, www.marxists.org/italiano.
MARX, Karl [2004] – Manoscritti economico-filosofici del 1844, trad. e introd. di N. Bobbio, Torino, Einaudi.
MORONCINI, Bruno [1984] – Walter Benjamin e la moralità del moderno, Napoli, Guida.
MORONCINI, Bruno [2005] – Requiem per la scomparsa del padrone. il ruolo di Hegel nel dibattito sulla sovranità, in Arienzo – Caruso (a cura di), Conflitti, Napoli, Libreria Dante&Descartes, 2005, 99.
PFERSMANN, Otto [2004] – Law’s normativity in Spinoza’s naturalism, in Cardozo law review, 25, 643-656.
REICH, Wilhelm [2002] – Psicologia di massa del fascismo, con un saggio di A. Zamperini, Torino, Einaudi.
REIK, Theodor [1953] – Le Masochisme, Paris, Payot.
RETIF DE LA BRETONNE, Nicolas [1784, 1972] – La paysanne pervertie, Paris, Garnier-Flammarion.
RICŒUR, Paul [1965] – De l’interprétation. Essai sur Freud, Paris, Seuil.
RICŒUR, Paul [2001] – Le juste 2, Paris, Esprit.
RICŒUR, Paul [2006] – Le juste, la justice et son échec, Paris, Carnets l’Herne.
ROSENFELD, Michel [2000] – Interpretazioni. Il diritto fra etica e politica, Bologna, Il Mulino.
SAFATLE, Vladimir Pinheiro [2002] – L’acte au-delà de la Loi: Kant ave Sade comme point de torsion de la pensée lacanienne, in Essaim, n. 10, 2002, 73-106.
SOUSA SANTOS, Boaventura [2004] – Vers un Nouveau Sens Commun juridique. Droit, science et politique dans la transition paradigmatique, trad. Nathalie Gonzales Lajoie, Paris, LGDJ.
SPINOZA, Baruch [2005] – Etica. Trattato teologico-politico, a cura di Remo Cantoni e Franco Fergnani, Torino, UTET.
SUTTER, Laurent [2009] – Deleuze. La pratique du droit, Paris, Michalon.
TAYLOR, Charles [1998] – Il disagio della modernità, Bari-Roma, Laterza.
WELLMER, Albrecht [1986] – Ethik und Dialog. Elemente des moralischen Urteil bei Kant und in der Diskursethik, Krankfurt.
ŽIZEK, Slavoj [2001] – Kant and Sade: the ideal coup le, in http://lacan.com/frameXIII2.htm
ŽIZEK, Slavoj [1996] – The indivisble remainder, Londra, Verso.
ŽIZEK, Slavoj [2006] – Matrix, in La subjectivité à venir, Paris, Flammarion.
ŽIZEK, Slavoj [2007] – La sujet qui fâche. Le centre absent de l’ontologie politique, Paris, Flammarion.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in the Journal agree to the following terms:
– Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence, allowing the work to be shared as long as proper credit is given to the authors and the initial publication in the Journal is acknowledged;
– Reusers must provide appropriate credit, include a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses the reuser or their use;
– Reusers may not apply additional restrictions, legal terms, or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits;
– Reusers must attribute credit to the creator and allow others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, exclusively for noncommercial purposes and under the same terms, in compliance with Brazilian Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, and other applicable regulations.
