Teachers' attitudes toward Personalized Learning Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v10i2.78774Palabras clave:
Digital environments, Attitudes, Personal learning environments, PLE.Resumen
Introduction: Teachers' attitude towards digital resources is a reliable predictor of how they will use technology in a pedagogical context. The purpose of this study was to identify the attitudes of teachers towards personalized learning environments (PLE) and factors that determine their acceptance or rejection to these new contexts. Methodology: The survey technique was applied to collect sample data using an instrument, which contains two scales, one to measure attitudes toward technology and the other to determine attitudes towards personalized learning environments, as well as a third section to collect participants´ demographic data. Results: Outcomes of one-way ANOVAs of 334 teachers who were enrolled in the master’s degree of education programs in Ecuador confirm that teachers have a positive attitude towards PLE, at a higher or lower level depending on their knowledge or use of PLE. Conclusions: Inferences can be made that PLE can be an important pedagogical strategy as long as teachers' attitudes, experiences and knowledge are considered.Citas
Adams, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED582134.pdf
Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93-102. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.033
Álvarez, S., Cuellar, C., López, B., Adrada, C., Anguiano, R., Bueno, A., Comas, I., & Gómez, S. (2011). Actitudes de los profesores ante la integración de las TIC en la práctica docente: Estudio de un grupo de la Universidad de Valladolid. Edutec-e Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 35. Retrieved from http://edutec.rediris.es/Revelec2/Revelec35/
Al-Zaidiyeen, N., Lai Mei, L., & Fook, F. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes and levels of technology use in classrooms: The case of Jordan schools. International Education Studies, 3(2), 211-218. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n2p211
Baker, R. (2016). Using learning analytics in personalized learning. In M. Murphy, S. Redding, & J. Twyman (Eds.). Handbook on personalized learning for states, districts, and schools, 165–174. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, Center on Innovations in Learning. Retrieved from www.centeril.org
Banyard, P., & Underwood, J. (2008). Understanding the learning space. eLearning Papers, 9, July. Retrieved from www.elearningpapers.eu
Bresnitz, E. A., Ross, M.C., Hall, G.E., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1997). A randomized study to assess the facilitation of faculty implementation of computer-based learning in medical education. Journal of Medical Education Technologies, 6(3), 19-35.
Bustos, A., Engel, A., Saz, A., & Coll, C. (2012). Integrating personal and institutional learning environments. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/5757502/Integrating_personal_and_institutional_virtual_learning_environments
Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 105, 1-13. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003
Castañeda, L., Tur, G., & Torres-Kompen, R. (2019). Impacto del concepto PLE en la literatura sobre educación: la última década. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1), pre-print. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.22079
Cavas, B., Cavas, P., Karaoglon, B., & Kisla, T. (2009). A study on science teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies in education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technologies, 8(2), 20-32.
Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M.; Bartolomé-Pina, A.; Cebrián-Robles, D. & Ruiz-Torres, M. (2015). Estudio de los Portafolios en el Practicum: Análisis de un PLE-Portafolios. RELIEVE, 21(2), art. M1. doi: 10.7203/relieve.21.2.7479.
Christensen, C., Horn, M., & Johnson, C. (2011). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw Hill, New York.
Dabbagh, N., & Fake, H. (2017). College students’ perceptions of personal learning environments through the lens of digital tools, processes and spaces. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 30-38. doi: 10.7821/naer.2017.1.215
Dartt, M. (2011). The impact of teachers’ attitudes on technology use during instruction. Doctoral Dissertation, Liberty University. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1466&context=doctoral
Downes, S. (2007). Learning networks in practice. National Research Council Publications Records, Canada. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/2869500/Learning_networks_in_practice
Doyle, S., & Senske, N. (2016). Exploring learning objectives for digital design in architectural education. Architecture Conference Proceedings and Presentations, 86.
http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/arch_conf/86
Gallego-Arrufat, M.J., & Chaves-Barboza, E. (2014). Tendencias en estudios sobre Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje (PLE). Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 49. Retrieved from http://edutec.rediris.es/Revelec2/Revelec49/n49_Gallego_Chaves.html
García, J., & González, M. (2017). Entornos personales de aprendizaje de estudiantes universitarios costarricenses de educación: Análisis de las herramientas de búsqueda de información. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 35(2), 389-407. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.35.2.253101
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Ally & Bacon.
Hittleman, D., & Simon, A. (2006). Interpreting educational research: An introduction for consumers of research. New York, NY: Pearson.
Jerez V., & Barroso, J. (2020). Identificación de los componentes del Entorno Personal de Aprendizaje de estudiantes de ingeniería. EDMETIC, 9(2), 202-221. doi: https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v9i2.12602
Léris, D., & Sein-Echaluce, M. (2011). La personalización del aprendizaje: Un objetivo del paradigma educativo centrado en el aprendizaje. ARBOR, 187(3), 123-134. doi: https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2011.Extra-3n3135
López, J., & Ortega, J. (2017). Cambios en la percepción del profesorado sobre la incidencia positiva de las tecnologías digitales en educación primaria y secundaria. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Docencia, 18, 97-108. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.17561/reid.v0i18.3401
Males, N. (2011). Uses and attitudes toward educational technology among new teachers in urban schools: a Correlacional study. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Phoenix. Retrieved from https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/883382579.html?FMT=AI
Mejía, A., Silva, C., Villarreal, C., Suárez, D., & Villamizar, C. (2018). Estudio de los factores de resistencia al cambio y actitud hacia el uso educativo de las tic por parte del personal docente. Revista Boletín Redipe, 7(2), 53-63. Retrieved from http://revista.redipe.org/index.php/1/article/view/428
Minguillon, J., Mor, E., Santanach, F., & Guardia, L. (2005). Personalización del proceso de aprendizaje usando “Learning Objects” Reutilizables. Revista de Educación a Distancia, IV. Retrieved from http://www.um.es/ead/red/M4/minguillon32.pdf
Myers, D. (2005). Psicología Social. México City, MX: McGraw-Hill.
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico [OCDE]. (2006). Escuelas del futuro: La personalización de la enseñanza. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/36234148.pdf.
Peña, I. (2013). El PLE de investigación-docencia: el aprendizaje como enseñanza. En L. Castañeda y J. Adell (Eds.), Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje: Claves para el ecosistema educativo en red, 93-110. Alcoy: Marfil.
Phillips, B. (2016). Beyond classroom learning: Personalized learning through digital technologies. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11790/255
Rana, H. (2012). A study to assess teacher educators' attitudes towards technology integration in classrooms. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends & Practices, 2(2), 190-205. Retrieved from http://mierjs.in/ojs/index.php/mjestp/article/view/36
Redding, S. (2016). Competencies and personalized learning. In M. Murphy, S. Redding, & J. Twyman (Eds.), Handbook on personalized learning for states, districts, and schools, 3–18. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, Center on Innovations in Learning.
Sahin, M., & Kilsa, T. (2016a). An analysis of university students ‘attitudes towards Personalized Learning Environments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15 (1), 1-10. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086195.pdf
Sahin, M., & Kisla, T. (2016b). Developing a valid and reliable attitude scale towards personalized learning. Kastamonu Education Journal, 24(4), 1713-1726. Retrieved from https://kefdergi.kastamonu.edu.tr/index.php/Kefdergi/article/view/497
Sahin, S. & Uluyol, C. (2016). Preservice Teachers’ Perception and Use of Personal Learning Environments (PLEs). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2284.
Salinas, J. (2016). La investigación ante los desafíos de los escenarios de aprendizaje futuros. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 50, 1-24. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red/50/13
Samak, Z. (2006). An exploration of Jordanian English language teachers ‘attitudes, skills, and access as indicator of information and communication technology integration in Jordan. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Florida State University. Retrieved from http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu:168189/datastream/PDF/view
Seraji,N., Ziabarin, R., & Rokni, S. (2017). Teacher’s attitudes towards educational technology in English language institutes. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(2). doi: 10.5539/ijel.v7n2p176
Scherer, P., & Ferrari, D. (2018). Experiences with web 2.0 in school settings: a framework to foster educational practices based on a Personal Learning Environment perspective. Educação em Revista, 34, 1-27. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698162010
Sideeg, A. (2016). Bloom’s Taxonomy, Backward Design, and Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development in crafting learning outcomes. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2). ISSN 1948-5425. Retrieved from http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijl/article/view/9252
Tomé-Fernández, M., Curiel-Marín, E., & Caraballo, E. (2020). Use of Mobile Technologies in Personal Learning Environments of Intercultural Contexts: Individual and Group Tasks. Electronics, 9(5), 876. doi: 10.3390/electronics9050876
Torres R., Edirisingha, P., Canaleta, X., Alsinaa, M., & Monguet, J. (2019). Personal Learning Environments based on Web 2.0 services in higher education. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.003
Tur, G., & Marín, V. (2015). Exploring students ‘attitudes and beliefs towards e-portfolios and technology in education. Enseñanza and Teaching, 33(1), 57-82 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/et20153315782
Villalonga, C., & Marta-Lazo, C. (2015). Modelo de integración educomunicativa de 'Apps' móviles para la enseñanza y aprendizaje. Revista de Medios y Educación, 46, 137-153. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/368/36832959014.pdf
Yuliang, L., & Huang, C. (2005). Concerns of teachers about technology integration in the USA. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(1), 35-48.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
La revista AtoZ es una revista científica de acceso abierto y los derechos de autor de artículos y entrevistas pertenecen a sus respectivos autores/encuestados. Los autores otorgan a la AtoZ el direito de incluir el material publicado (revisado por pares/pos-print) en em sistemas/herramientas de indización, agregadores o curadores.
Los autores tienen permiso y se les anima a depositar sus artículos en sus páginas personales, depósitos y/o portales institucionales anteriormente (pre-print) y posteriormente (post-print) a la publicación en esa Revista. Se pide, si possible, que se apunte la referencia bibliográfica del artículo (incluyendose la URL) en base a la AtoZ.
La AtoZ es sello verde por Diadorim/IBICT.
Todo el contenido de la revista (incluyendo las instrucciones, modelos y política editorial) a menos que se indique otra cosa, están bajo una Licencia de Atribución de Bienes Comunes Creativos (CC) 4.0 Internacional.
Cuando los artículos son publicados por esta revista, se pueden compartir (copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier soporte o formato para cualquier propósito, incluso comercial) y adaptar (remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso si es comercial). Debe dar el crédito correspondiente, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios.
La AtoZ no cobra cualquier tasas por la sumisión y/o procesamiento y/o la publicación de artículos.
